Close

San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Due Process Clause forbids the introduction of evidence so unduly prejudicial as to render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair

Andrew v. White (U.S., Jan. 21, 2025, No. 23-6573) 2025 WL 247502 Summary: Supreme Court’s decision in Payne v. Tennessee, 111 S.Ct. 2597, that Due Process Clause can in certain cases protect against introduction of unduly prejudicial evidence at criminal trials, was a “holding,” for purposes of federal habeas review…

Updated:

Trial court abused its discretion in not renewing Domestic Violence Restraining Order

Navarro v. Cervera (Cal. Ct. App., Jan. 22, 2025, No. A169830) 2025 WL 262412, at *1 Summary: Navarro appeals from an order denying her request to renew her domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against Cervera. Navarro asserts the trial court abused its discretion in concluding her fear of future abuse…

Updated:

Racial Justice Act claim must be preserved in trial court to be appealed

People v. Corbi (2024) 106 Cal.App.5th 25, 35 [327 Cal.Rptr.3d 284, 289], as modified on denial of reh’g (Nov. 20, 2024), review filed (Dec. 4, 2024) Summary: Corbi was convicted in the Superior Court, San Diego County, of second degree murder with a firearm enhancement. Corbi appealed. The Court of…

Updated:

Dana Stubblefield’s conviction reversed because of Violation of Racial Justice Act

People v. Stubblefield (Cal. Ct. App., Dec. 26, 2024, No. H048598) 2024 WL 5231745, at *1–2 Summary: A jury found Stubblefield guilty of forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, and false imprisonment of Jane Doe, an intellectually disabled woman. The jury found he personally used a firearm in the commission of…

Updated:

Superior Court had no authority to reduce a wobbler offense

People v. Superior Court of Ventura County (Cal., Dec. 12, 2024, No. S281950) 2024 WL 5100944 Summary: The Supreme Court held that: The Superior Court had no authority to reduce wobbler offense; The order reducing wobbler offense was not appealable;An unauthorized order reducing wobbler offense is act in excess of…

Updated:

Limitation On Credit To Advance A YouthParole Eligibility Date Do Not Violate Equal Protection Of Law

In re Nguyen (Cal. Ct. App., Nov. 27, 2024, No. B329158) 2024 WL 4901809, at *1 Summary: Nguyen was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term with the possibility of parole. Penal Code section 3046 establishes a minimum eligible parole date (MEPD) for when that hearing will occur. Additionally, because Nguyen…

Contact Us